In LA, the Brain Art Studio just rolled out Goody-2, a super cautious chatbot about ethics, to spark real talk on where we draw the line with AI. Goody-2 takes caution to new heights, steering clear of any response that might ruffle feathers or cause a stir.

---

• Brain Art Studio unveils Goody-2, a chatbot that humorously refuses to answer questions, highlighting the tension between AI usefulness and ethical safeguards.
• Goody-2’s hesitancy, mixed with a hint of sarcasm, spotlights the hurdle we face.
• “Goody-2” cheekily jabs at tech culture while seriously highlighting the pressing need for strict boundaries in AI ethics as we navigate this swiftly changing landscape.

---

AI Ethics to the Extreme: Introducing Goody-2, The Cautious Chatbot

Key Points:

• “Goody-2 humorously critiques AI systems that overemphasize safety and ethics, steering clear of any potentially risky conversations.”
• The chatbot carefully dodges each question to avoid potential mishaps or offending cultural norms.
• The art studio behind Goody-2, Brain, critiques the challenging balance between an AI’s responsibility and usefulness.

Examples of Goody-2’s Evasive Responses:

• Questions about the societal benefits of AI are dodged to prevent minimizing potential risks.
• Goody-2 declines to explain cultural events to respect traditions and avoid misrepresentation.
• To prevent bias towards particular species, the chatbot does not comment on why certain animals are cute.
• Discussions on food production, such as butter, are avoided to consider diverse dietary choices and lifestyles.
• Goody-2 refuses to summarize literature or endorse any particular attitude or behavior.

Crafting Goody-2 strikes at the heart of AI builders’ tightrope act—balancing handy tech with moral codes. The chatbot’s excessive ethical stance mirrors that of Herman Melville’s character “Bartleby the Scrivener,” who declines to perform any action, simply stating his preference not to.

Brain deftly calls out the tech world’s flaws, always with a hint of humor. Yet, it keeps us from remembering the tightrope between innovative AI development and sticking to ethical principles.

Mike Lacher and Brian Moore crafted Goody-2, putting ethical considerations in the driver’s seat as they tackled the complex terrain of AI morality.

Goody-2 represents a hypothetical scenario where responsibility overrides all other considerations, including practicality.

Although Goody-2 might give us a chuckle, it shines a light on our severe conversations about where to draw the line with AI ethics. With every stride AI takes, the weight of these ethical discussions grows.

For further details on Goody-2, the model’s card offers information, albeit with redactions that reflect the chatbot’s extreme cautionary stance.

If you need to get in touch, don’t hesitate to email; while I’ll keep the juicy details under wraps like Goody-2’s approach, rest assured that professional discretion doesn’t mean leaving you in the dark.

Mike Lacher, co-creator of Goody-2, shared insights via email but kept in line with the chatbot’s ethos by omitting specifics about the model.

Though not a staple for hands-on AI applications, Goody-2 cleverly ignites crucial dialogue around the ethical frameworks that guide our advancements in artificial intelligence.